Showing posts with label alimony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alimony. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2009

ALIENATION OF AFFECTIONS -- Tax on the rich?


A good friend of mine (not a lawyer, but a naturally gifted cross-examining talent) reports saying this to his wife:
-- Honey, are you cheating on me?
-- Of course not, darling!
-- You seeing somebody else?
-- No, darling!
-- You having sex with anybody else?
-- Yes, dear.
Spouses cheat on each other. I know you do not want to hear this. I do not really want to have to say it to you. But it is best you hear it from me, not from some ass who gives no care for your well-being, right?
Most married people will develop an interest in somebody other than their spouse. Apparently, the French do it with dignity and to the advantage of their husbands. This may just be a rumor fueled by too much Balzac. I do not know. Here in America, your spouse will always manage to choose the most unacceptable, embarrassing and annoying liaison.
Your wife will cheat on you with your best friend, with her best friend, with her high school sweetheart, with your high school sweetheart, with her secretary (male, if you are lucky). She will do that with no provocation or reason. If you so much as forget her birthday, though, she will get really upset and sleep with your gardener, general contractor, beekeeper … and the dentist.
Assuming you are not the sharing sort, what do you do? First, you must change dentists. With that settled, you have several options. Infidelity is a complete bar to receiving alimony in North Carolina. You might quickly sue for divorce, invest the savings in a late model Lamborghini, and seek the next love of your life. Assuming you love your wife, however, your options become limited. You will likely consider one or more of the following: filing a complaint with the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners, challenging a duel, trying to schedule a couple’s counseling session with your wife, or turning for help to De Beers. Those are all very good options, but the State of North Carolina presents you with one truly unique opportunity.

This sort of feels like a combination of the Board complaint, the duel and the counseling session. Whether De Beers figures into this, I am not quite certain.
As they say in the entertainment industry, put your hands together for – wait for it -- a tort action known as "alienation of affections." Copyright (c) 2009 Aylward

To be continued

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Marital Economy




My phone rang unusually early.
A deep, calm, confident voice inquired:

"Is now a good time to divorce my wife?"
"It is seven o'clock on Saturday. Best time to stay married," I opined.
The man chuckled, but pressed on eagerly.
"The economy. You know I mean the economy. Don’t you read the papers!"
"The bloody Academy again," I thought.

This "recession / divorce" buzz is nothing new. In 2008, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers released a survey revealing that American citizens could no longer afford the luxury of divorcing each other.

The 2008 Academy survey confirmed what intuitively made good economic sense: a time of unemployment, salary cuts and price increases is not at all conducive to splurging on a brand new second household, complete with children's beds, second set of puppies, dishes and linens and toys. There are also expenses for soon-to-be-ex-wife's re-adjustment to re-enter work, and soon-to-be-ex-husband's newly discovered costs of cleaning, laundry, supervising help, and babysitters. The analysis was simple and solid.

Not leaving good enough alone, the Academy re-surveyed. The Academy's Spring 2009 survey uncovered a new and quite different trend.

On March 31, 2009, the bomb exploded. High-end divorces are on the rise, child support modification suits are abundant, and men -- rich and poor -- are back in court trying to modify down the generous spousal support which—they claim-- they can no longer afford to honor. The survey sent the country buzzing about the "good time to divorce."

On June 15, the National Law Journal weighed in, declaring: "Recession Keeps Family Lawyers Busy." Divorce lawyers of America told the reporters that they were "jammed" and that the time was now, and that "you should settle today because tomorrow it may be worth half." The Americans whose "ten things to do before I die" list included ”Divorce My Spouse” cheered up and went divorce lawyer shopping.

The optimistic readership of the National apparently included my new friend -- the man who rang at seven in the morning to inquire about a fiscally responsible way of giving the heave-ho to his wife. The newspapers told him that, since his assets were valued low, his pensions and stocks had plummeted, and his real estate was falling, now was the opportune time for romantic disentanglement.

"So is now a good time or not?" He wanted an answer, and he wanted it to be monosyllabic.

But it’s not as simple as he wanted it to be. In truth, the fiscal ramifications of a divorce depend on a multitude of tangled factors, most of which have no direct relationship with the economy. First, the "best time" for him and the best time for her is almost never the same time, so there can not be such a thing as "a universally good time to be divorced." When the economy devalues marital assets, and your client asks if buying out his spouse is a good idea, the only proper answer is: "it depends."

It depends on the man's current cashflow, on whether the presently devalued asset will ever spring back. It also depends on the opportunity costs of not investing the cash elsewhere; in the case of real estate, it may depend on the cost of providing alternative accommodations for the wife and kids, and on the emotional issues which often surround real estate transactions. All of these are more or less the same issues as the client was facing in the good economy. Then again, there is alimony and child support. In a bad economy the standard of living might go down, and with it the support amount. On the other hand, will paying even the lower amount destroy the now precarious balance of the soon-to-be-ex-husband's recession-weakened business? What if he were to wait to divorce until the wife bites the bullet and gets employment? Even a part-time job might give family court the courage to admit that the woman can fend for herself economically.

"Yes or no?!" the man was no longer calm.
He was quite aggressively insistent. (Perhaps a characteristic that contributed to the apparently delicate state of his marriage?)
"You should stay married," I admitted. "Well, stay married at least until Monday. Have your financial advisor send me your latest statements. I will tell you on Wednesday whether the world economy is ready for your divorce."

The financial goal in divorce is quite simple: to come out better off as compared to one's pre-divorce position. Divorce economics is more about redistributing the family's personal credit card debt than about the surging US national debt. Personal cash flow will matter substantially more than the ups and downs of gas prices. The client's career prospects are much more relevant than the national unemployment average. A skilled divorce attorney will consider the client's personal debt, personal cash flow, career prospects, level of inter-spouse enmity, health issues, presence of extramarital affairs, and the habitual dispositions of the assigned judge.

How about the economy? Not a big deal in The Divorce Game. Don’t worry about it. Really.